
|
 |
And she got married! Essence Atkins married the guy she met on Match.com two years ago. If you wonder about the quality of the men and women on dating sites, it’s hard to argue with this pairing:
ESSENCE ATKINS MARRIES HER INTERNET BEAU: Couple jumped the broom Saturday in Pasadena. G. Garvin provided the food.
*Actress Essence Atkins, best known for her role on the UPN sitcom “Half and Half,” has married her boyfriend Jaime Mendez after meeting him less than two years ago through an online dating site.
According to People.com, the wedding took place Saturday at the Ambassador Mansion and Gardens in Pasadena, Calif, The couple met on Valentine’s Day of last year through Match.com.
“I wrote him a quick little note that I had read his profile, and then I signed off, Happy SAD Day – that’s Single Awareness Day,” says Essence, 37. A week later the couple went on their first date, and they were engaged a year later.
The bride wore a Stephen Yearick gown for the ceremony and an Angel Rivera dress for the reception, according to People. “I felt like a princess,” she says.
Her former costar Valerie Pettiford performed original music at the reception. Plus, the bride surprised her husband with a salsa band to celebrate his Puerto Rican heritage.
“We’ve been taking salsa lessons. It’s part of what we’ve been doing together as a couple,” she says.
TV One personality, chef G. Garvin, blended Puerto Rican and traditional soul food dishes, which included mac and cheese, roasted pork, peach cobbler and plantains.
As party favors, guests received match books and travel-sized candles. But singles guests were given six-month memberships to Match.com.

For some reason, I have been seeing lots of online dating information from our friends Down Under. Here’s a list of 50 reasons why you should try online dating. While a couple are specific to Australia, most apply anywhere. And it is the best list I have seen—and the most positive—about why to get online and start looking.
Online Dating Fifty Reasons Australian Singles Use Online Dating
75% of online singles claim they are looking for a life partner - a much higher percentage than the locals down the pub.
Australian online dating sites guard you from overseas online daters.
Contact is quick when online dating, with free sites offering instant messenger, video cam chat and groups, there is a chance for everyone to converse the
way they choose to.
Convenience.
Dating profiles allow you to accurately determine if an online single would suit you.
Even if you don’t meet a long lasting partner, you can make many friends with common interests.
We all know someone who met their partner online and that could be you.
Fear of rejection is lessened as everybody is aware of where they stand before they chat to initial members and can decide whether to pursue or not.
Online dating can enable you to chat secretly with several singles before taking the next step.
Online dating allows singles to get to know someone fairly well before committing to meeting them in person.
Online dating can be very safe if you don’t hand out private information in early chats - the other member has no way of tracing you.
Online dating can assist you overcome feelings of shyness, paranoia and insecurity.
Online dating chat can be kept for later reference, meaning you wont forget what you were chatting about.
.
Online dating chat rooms offer an excellent source of dating advice for new timers or the not so experienced.
Online dating isn’t dangerous - you don’t have to go to meet an unknown stranger and you can always let your mother know where you are.
Online dating can be very private, no one need know that you have joined a dating site.
Online dating means you can find groups of singles or set up your own groups for similar minded singles.
Online dating profiles can inform you about a person more so than initial conversations usually can, therefore you are more likely to choose someone with suitable dating credentials.
Potential partners have a better chance to get to know one an other as they are not restricted by closing times, the picture theatre finishing or the date ending.
The best free sites allow singles to chat endlessly without charge.
The amount of online singles available is huge.
The online dating friends you find may be sober!
The friends you meet are single (hopefully!) and you wont have to second guess it.
Statistics show the chances of your online dating relationship will out last “conventional” dating methods.
There are usually new online dating members waiting to chat.
There isn’t any social stigma attached to online nowadays.
Web cam chat permits you to see the other member and so you can tell if the attraction is there.
You are not limited by distance.
You cant get sunburnt when online dating.
You can “date” many singles in the early days then find the one you like the best.
You can easily get out of online friendships that are not working.
You can flirt away until your hearts content, safe that nobody will take you too seriously - unless you would like them to.
You can find people wanting the same amount of commitment - marriage, serious romance, casual sex, friendship, chat and dates.
You can find people with marginal interests that match yours - You may not be the only one who collects lunch boxes? Online you will discover someone else who shares your interest.
You can meet someone fast - often on the first sign on.
You can sometimes see the singles you would like to chat with before initiating a conversation.
You can online date and don’t have to feel guilty at leaving your dog home by themself.
You can go online dating at any time of the day or night.
You can online date when the kids are asleep and get to know others without introducing lots of new “dads” or “mums”
You do not need to ask for someone’s mobile number to online date them, the method of contact is established.
You do not need any money when online dating using free dating sites.
You do not need such great social skills when online dating. You can get to know people over time and get over any initial awkwardness.
You do not need to get new clothes and dress up to meet online singles.
You don’t get surrounded in smoke when you are internet dating (or alternatively you can smoke yourself to death whilst online dating)
You don’t have to wait for the weekend to meet your dream partner - you could chat to them before work, during work (don’t get caught!) or after work.
You wont get burgled while you are online dating.

Looks like Oprah’s magazine has a good article this month about Internet dating—and this is a marvelous technique: Setting a goal for dating (first dates, anyway) a large number of people. It’s reasonable to expect that in 100 first dates, you’d find one worth sticking with.
What I Learned from Dating 100 Men
By Ann Marsh
She was 34 and she meant business, so she placed an ad with an online dating service and let the e-mails roll in.
Last year, in under six months, I dated more than 100 men. I dated on beaches, on hiking trails, on the back of a Harley-Davidson. I told more than 100 men about my work, my family, my years in Czechoslovakia. I weathered personal-revelation fatigue and relied on pep talks from girlfriends to see me through. I didn’t kiss any of these men, reserving physical contact for the one—I might as well say it—who would eventually win my heart.
After years alone, on the cusp of my 35th birthday, I was serious. I’d learned that letting myself kiss the wrong guy set in motion a sort of unwitting hormonal bonding stronger than rational thinking. If I was going to meet the right man, I decided, I needed to remain chemical-free, to think clearly, to get to know him first.
I didn’t understand this in my 20s. Back then, I’d followed the Hollywood movie model wherein men and women tend to tumble into bed, then into love, and finally into marriage. The string of breakups I endured demonstrated that, for me at least, this strategy wasn’t working.
My frequent experiences with the Wrong Man also taught me what I wanted this time around. I was looking for someone who could see my best self despite my imperfections. A gentle but strong man with the capacity to become as deeply devoted to me as I would be to him. In a word: available. I suspected it might take awhile to find him in greater Los Angeles, and I was right.
To get started, I posted an ad on an online dating site. I asked a girlfriend to take a picture of me bathed in late afternoon sunlight and wore the most glamorous smile I could muster. I stated that I wanted a man who “somehow manages to strike that tricky balance of being both dependable and spontaneous. Or who can happily tolerate both of these aspects in me.”
I got a lot of responses right off the bat. Some were ludicrous, like the 50-something guy in a Hawaiian shirt who offered to fly me to Vegas for the weekend. I deleted far more than I answered. But Week One still found me on dates with 14 men at local coffee shops. In Week Two, I slowed down to seven. I shook hands with a Danish architect and an hour later zoomed across town to meet a swoony soap opera actor. The next day was tea with an airfreight handler, followed that evening by a walk with a real estate lawyer. I dated aerospace engineers, entrepreneurs, doctors, an oceanographer, film animators, a romantic man who lived impecuniously on a boat, and a self-proclaimed gazillionaire who resided atop a mountain.
“Are you insane?” my astonished girlfriends said, laughing.
I was overwhelmed but exhilarated. And I overdid it. At the end of Week One, I startled friends and myself by bursting uncontrollably into tears. A lifetime of pent-up loneliness came unglued all at once. Then I hit a groove. No matter how the date went, I reminded myself I was taking a stand for what I wanted.
And I tried to relax. I steadied myself right before each new hello. Nothing was worse or more exquisite than my date’s first flicker of disappointment or approval. If he clearly wasn’t interested—like the swing-dancing entertainment lawyer or the Harvard-educated wine expert—then he was simply another woman’s catch. I got out of her way. I knew I’d meet someone else tomorrow. Even if a first date wasn’t fantastic, I tended to accept second dates to make sure I hadn’t been too hasty in my judgment. About four or five men survived through fourth or fifth dates before I said goodbye. The thing I liked best about my whole dating project was that it validated that nagging sense I’d had for years: Every Saturday night I’d spent alone or with girlfriends, I’d believed there had to be several thousand potential dates out there for me, somewhere. It turns out I was right.
To date so many men, I needed to be honest in a new way. In my 20s, when the wrong man asked me out, I usually lied. I was either (a) busy, (b) dating someone else, or (c) moving to Siberia for a year. Sensing my fib, some men refused to let go. A few talked me into dates or, worse, relationships. I marvel to think I left the nest without ever learning how to verbalize my own needs and desires.
One of my earliest electronic dates taught me about honesty. “It was really nice to meet you,” the tall, good-looking athlete wrote me in an e-mail after Date Number Two, “but I didn’t feel that indescribable something that would tell me we’re a match.”
I sat there looking at my computer screen. He had found the words to describe my own sentiments. I didn’t feel rejected. I felt liberated by his courage. Better yet, I stole his line.
A handsome telecommunications executive I met over a drink at a restaurant one evening looked and sounded far less alluring to me a few days later in the sober light of day. In a subsequent telephone conversation, my whole body tensed while I told him that I didn’t get the sense he was the right one and that I didn’t want either of us to waste precious time. I wished him well. He sounded a little startled. But the discomfort was short-lived. We were both free.
It’s embarrassing to admit that I was learning the very basics about personal boundaries at the age of 34. But it was also a thrill. Like a suit of comfortable, lightweight body armor, my newly declared boundaries kept me safe.
At times my faith flagged, like when the well-spoken National Guard pilot bought me a single California roll for dinner and called for the check. Phew. Rejection in a bit of raw fish. The best remedy was always the next date. When the soap opera actor or the triathlete didn’t call—both of whom had looked deep into my eyes and proclaimed their attraction to me—I did nothing. I let them go. I wanted a man whose actions matched his words.
The initial frenzy mellowed to a couple of dates a month, and one sunny Sunday afternoon in late summer, I met Johanne. I had, by this time, trained myself to listen closely to what my deepest instincts said in the first nanosecond of meeting a man. “Hmm...maybe,” I thought when I spied him waiting across the Art Deco lobby of a seaside hotel. With every subsequent date, the voice grew surer.
I never expected my man would come from a faraway continent where he was raised on a tea plantation, but he does. We can talk and play and work things out together. We have each finally found a home in the other.
Johanne says he’s more confident in my feelings for him, knowing I looked long and hard to find him. He’s right. The parade of men who preceded him helped me know myself better. They repeatedly tested my ability to speak up or to stay quiet when I needed to. They certainly taught me to appreciate the man who, in the end, answered not only my ad but my dreams.

Many newbies to Internet dating wonder about how the whole process works. This below is a part of an article—not the whole thing—that pretty much goes step by step through a typical process. Thanks, Rebecca!
How to meet people: Internet dating
Hi, my name is Rebecca. I haven’t been on the dating scene in years, and in fact I met my ex-partner, and previous boyfriends, through friends. So, it was a bit of a shock to realise that it’s been nearly two years since I broke up with my partner and yet here I am, still single. Two years seems like a very long time to me and I would really like someone special to share my life with.
But, here I am, desperate and dateless. I have only myself to blame because I haven’t even made an effort to get a date in the last two years. I’ve been quite busy with work and an active social life. I must admit that I had visions of just one day stumbling across Mr Right: our eyes would meet, romantic violin music would play, we would just be drawn to one another and that would be that. The whole world of online dating, speed-dating, singles events and dating agents just seems so bewildering. Where should I even start?
Well, I decided to try online dating first because it was something that I could do almost anonymously, without even leaving the house. It seemed like a good way to test the waters of the dating world.
The first step was to find a website that I liked the look of. I typed “online dating” into a search engine and found some great sites. I finally settled on a website that seemed really easy to use. The main page had a series of search boxes, so I selected my criteria and clicked on the search button. Hundreds of results came up. Hmmmm. Too many to go through. I went back to the search page and narrowed my criteria. 42 results. OK, that’s a bit better.
I looked through all of the results and found at least four guys that looked promising. I clicked one, but found that I had to register as a member first. This took a little while – the hardest part was creating an onscreen name or nickname. Once that was complete, I found out that I had to create a profile for myself and upload a photo before I could contact anyone on the site. Wow, this was going to take a bit of time.
I invited a girlfriend over one evening and we wrote my profile together, which took us hours. I agonised over what to say and what not to say! How to stand out but not appear too quirky. Then, my friend took dozens of photos of me, I finally chose one that I liked and we uploaded it onto the site.
The next day, I sat down to send a message to some of the men that I liked the look of. I didn’t have to wait long before I received a return message from one of them. I was so excited and nervous. This was it, I was actually internet dating! I sent him a message saying something along the lines of “I’m new to this and don’t really know what to say!” He responded with a very friendly email, he seemed really nice and I found myself quickly typing a reply with very little awkwardness.
Over the next several weeks, I sent out more messages, received a few messages and started email conversations with two very promising candidates. I finally met one of them last week for an after-work drink in the city. We thoroughly enjoyed our time together. I explained to him that I’m committed to trying out a few different dating methods over the next few weeks and he seemed to be OK with that. We agreed to touch base in a couple of weeks.
I would really like to meet up with this man again. I noticed that he had removed his profile from the dating website; I’m not sure what that indicates. Perhaps he’s already found somebody else: things move fast in the world of internet dating!
Will online dating work for me?
• It’s a great re-introduction to the dating scene
• You can chat online to people from the comfort and security of your own home
• You can take your time getting to know someone before committing to a date
• No more braving the cold to go to noisy and expensive bars and clubs
• With so many people to choose from, you can be quite specific in your criteria.
What should I be aware of?
• Never give out personal information such as your address, place of work or bank account details
• Make sure that your first meeting or date is in a public place and always let someone know where you’re going
• Registration or membership fees can seem daunting to first-time users who don’t quite trust the site enough to spend lots of money
• Bear in mind that some people lie about things such as weight, job and marital status
• Be careful to check what people want, and respect their wishes, particularly if they say they’re looking for a short-term relationship
• It can be exhausting looking through hundreds of profiles.

One of the best things for me—an inveterate do-it-yourselfer—about Internet dating is just that: the ability to take charge of your romantic life and do it yourself. But a frequent complaint that I hear from singles is the lack of time that doing it yourself takes. Just as “if a need exists, someone will fill the gap,” here’s a way to outsource your dating. While this does make me somewhat uncomfortable to think of able bodied folks hiring out mate finding, this does seem to be a worthwhile service for people who are challenged in some way that would make Internet dating difficult if not impossible, like severe dyslexics who write and read poorly, but might otherwise be good catches. What do you think?
‘Done For You’ Dating Service Proves Romance Can Be Outsourced
A Canadian company has introduced a brazen service that lets singles delegate their online dating to a representative who exchanges messages under their name. Done For You Dating combines the extensive selection of singles on the Internet with the convenience of a personal matchmaker.
Toronto, Canada (PRWEB) July 1, 2009 -- A Canadian company has introduced a new service that lets singles delegate their online dating to a representative who manages their profile and exchanges messages under their name.
Done For You Dating combines the extensive selection of singles on the Internet with the convenience of a personal matchmaker. Unlike traditional matchmaking services, which match clients within an internal database, Done For You Dating scouts millions of single women and men on the Internet for their clients’ perfect partner.
“Online dating is like hunting for buried treasure,” says Luke Chao, founder of Done For You Dating. “The treasure is there, but it takes an incredible amount of digging through dirt before you find it. And most busy professionals don’t have that much time or emotional energy to spare.”
Dating representatives at the company are selected to be socially savvy, skilled writers who are knowledgeable about popular culture. They receive specific training in online dating and personal branding.
“We promote the client’s best qualities,” says Sue Bedford, a representative at Done For You Dating. “It’s already a borderline immoral service, so we go the extra mile to represent clients fairly, accurately and factually.”
Company founder Luke Chao is the managing director of The Morpheus Clinic for Hypnosis, where he first started helping men overcome problems interacting with women. He is the ghostwriter of several books, including Sydnee Steele’s Seducing Your Woman.

Here’s another article that points to the good effect that the economy is having on Internet dating and the search for love. My clients are telling me that they are seeing more quality people online and more activity. That plus the prime New Years to Valentine’s Day period make for a fabulous time to get on a good dating site and start looking. (Underlines in the article below are mine)
www.cheapdate.com Memberships are soaring at dating websites as more singletons opt to screen out duds online before spending cash on a face-to-face date
ZOSIA BIELSKI
Cheapos unite, in digital love.
The downturn is proving to be a boon for online dating sites as Canadians look to hide in the arms of lovers they can suss out for free (or a nominal fee) online rather than over pricey fine dining that could yield a dud.
Websites such as Lavalife.com, PlentyofFish.com, Match.com and PerfectMatch.com have seen their memberships soar after September’s stock-market plunge.
Lavalife registrations are up 11 per cent from last month (Toronto is experiencing a 20-per-cent increase), and messaging among members is at its highest point in six months. Likewise, Vancouver-based dating site Plenty of Fish enjoyed a 77-per-cent growth in visits from December, 2007, through December, 2008. About 900,000 people now log in daily.
“It’s a pretty good deal at $25 a month to go out and meet people online, versus going out and spending 50 to 100 bucks per night and possibly not meeting anyone,” says Plenty of Fish spokesperson Mark Brooks, who delivered the keynote speech at the Internet Dating Conference in Miami last week.
The mood in Florida was upbeat, he said, with owners of free and niche dating sites in particular reporting huge growth.
That, Mr. Brooks said, is because unlike the real world, dating sites offer the lovelorn a “completely refined, focused community.”
“At the end of the day, if somebody wants to wander around and meet somebody, that’s not a good idea on two counts: No. 1, it’ll take them a long while and No. 2, if they do meet somebody, they’ve got to get all the difficult questions out of the way.”
Dating sites take care of the formalities: Plenty of Fish, for example, forces aspiring members to list their marital status, disclose whether they want children and how many times they booze it up in a week, and finally to elucidate “what makes you unique.”
In-person dates are, of course, far from extinct, but they are happening later in the romantic process. A survey by Florida-based Avalanche LLC - which operates international sites date.com, matchmaker.com and amor.com - found that 48 per cent of respondents were spending more time online or on the phone with a potential date before spending cash on a face-to-face meeting.
Dating sites have long relied on people’s romantic notions about “the right one” - as well as on their laziness and frugality, says Mandy Ketcheson, a Toronto-based psychotherapist who provides relationship counselling. “Online sites play on that hope with the added bonus of not having to go to a lot of trouble getting dressed up [and] spending money.”
For some of her single clients, cruising free dating sites has become a cheap hobby lately, with people “perusing other people more like commodities,” the way they might shop for deals on eBay, she said.
The psychotherapist adds that some of the searching is simple pragmatics: “There is a rising sense of desire to couple up in poor economic times because pooling resources is a better way to ride a bad economy.”
Joe Tracy, publisher of Online Dating Magazine, agrees that bad economic times force people to “reprioritize their goals in life.”
“People don’t like to face negative news alone,” he says. “It’s nice to have someone to share difficult times with. Thus they look harder for that ‘special someone.’ “
With online dating, the hunt costs a little less.
“There will still possibly be that ‘expensive dinner,’ usually around the second date, but the process allows singles to better filter and select who they want to go out with.”
“[Online dating] is like lipstick: It’s one of those comforting things that doesn’t cost a lot,” says Lavalife chief executive Marina Glogovac. “When people get disillusioned or structures are breaking down, they feel less confident or secure with the material things in their lives.”
Indeed, Paul A. Falzone, chief executive of Boston-based LoveAccess.com, says this windfall is reminiscent of what happened after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
“It just seems that people, when they’re confronted with any type of dilemma in their lives, they tend to want to migrate back to what’s comfortable to them. They go back to eating their comfort foods, they crank up the heat by the fire instead of going out all night, and they want someone to be able to share things with.”
That said, Mr. Falzone has no time for misers using online services to skimp on chivalry.
“If somebody is being a cheapskate, it’s a lot easier to act on a $29.95 subscription than it is to step up to the line. They might be getting their jollies meeting a lot of people, but they’ll never have a crack at them if they don’t step up and act like a fair human being about it and not expect everything for free.”

The period between New Year’s and Valentine’s Day is always the BEST for online dating. The economic slump has interestingly magnified that good news. People look for relationships and love in times of stress, and we are stressed.
Depressed Dow Drives Americans into Arms of Online Dating
A handful of online dating sites are reporting activity spikes following September’s global financial crisis.
“On days when the US Dow Jones industrial went down […] by more than 100 points, more people were likely to log in and spend more time on the site,”
stated Senior Research Scientist Gian Gonzaga in an interview with Reuters.
“People seek out companionship in times of stress. Studies repeatedly show that being in a relationship can help a person’s psychological and physical health.”
CEO Thomas Enraght-Moony of Match.com corroborates Gonzaga’s view. “During these trying times, people are looking for hope in their inbox,” he said.
November brought Match.com its largest membership increase in the last seven years.
But even lesser-known dating sites, like Perfectmatch.com, are seeing bounty. The latter reported a 47% hike in membership in the three months to November compared to the previous quarter.
An Opinion Research Corp. poll, sponsored by eHarmony, found 57% of Americans worry more about their love lives amidst the credit crunch. Married men were most affected, with 63% stressed over love.
And 75% of poll-takers between 25 and 34 worried whether the economy would negatively impact their love lives. Younger, single respondents were more likely to pursue a relationship as a result of these concerns.
Older respondents, which were more likely to be married, still worried financial issues would harm their existing relationships. “There are often more fights over bills and household budgets” among couples in climates like this one, Gonzaga pointed out.
The Opinion/eHarmony poll comprised 1,092 users. Meanwhile, a survey by Avalanche LLC — which operates date.com, matchmaker.com and amor.com — found 84% of people are spending more time online or over the phone before meeting face-to-face.
With all that in mind, it bodes well for the online dating industry that the Dow is down 35% this year.
Online dating services became aggressive advertisers in ‘07, with eHarmony spending the most: $110.1 million in total as of February last year. Match.com followed, spending $66.4 million in total.
Their efforts weren’t wasted. Prior to 2008, Mediamark Research found US adults were increasingly receptive to online dating, which was previously stigmatized as an arena for the desperate and unloveable. Men were slightly more likely to log onto an online dating site (52.2% versus 47.8%), and people between 18-34 consisted of over half of the online dating population. Single parents were significantly more likely than average to pursue a ‘net-based romance.
The face of online dating in general has evolved since then. Online speed dating debuted late last year. And last month, online dating conglomerate eHarmony lost a three-year-old suit for refusing to match gays, lesbians and bisexuals. The company will launch a gay dating site, “Compatible Partners,” in early 2009.

From my January 1, 2009, *eMAIL to eMATE* You are not a subcriber? Here’s how: http://www.find-a-sweetheart.com/pages/signup_for_newsletter/
Whether or not you have been using an Internet dating site to find love, a better question than “Why try Internet dating?” is “Why not?”
Yes, online daters experience myriad frustrations. Here are a few that I hear regularly from my clients:
It takes so much time.
I hate all that emailing.
I feel so exposed.
What if my friends/relatives/clients see me on a dating site?
Love should happen naturally, without this kind of effort.
The only people who contact me are jerks/fat/crazy/boring/out for my money/interested only in sex/not interested in sex/ugly/loaded with baggage/scary/liars.
I can’t write about myself.
I don’t have any good pictures.
Any of these sound familiar? Of course, there is some truth in each statement; otherwise, the complaints would not sound so believable. But none of these excuses are good enough reasons not to use the best tool that has come around to help older singles find love – singles over 30, I mean.
The Internet and dating sites are merely tools, good, sophisticated tools, but just tools, nonetheless. You the user have to learn to manipulate the tools to do what you want. If you are not using the tool properly, or haven’t learned how, it’s no surprise that you don’t get the results that you want.
Think of Internet dating sites like specialized telephone directories. Just as everyone with a land-line telephone gets a listing in the local telephone directory, any single with access to a computer and the Internet can sign up to be listed on an Internet dating site.
We all know how marvelously useful telephone books are. I’ll bet it would be hard to find a household without one. If you have a business, you’d be crazy not to have a phone book listing, because that’s where people go to find a plumber or beauty salon or the closest pizza parlor.
Similarly, Internet dating sites are very, very useful. The biggest advantage is that everyone listed is looking for love. Keep in mind how hard it is to tell if someone is looking if you bump into them in the grocery store. On a dating site, you know. And so does everybody else.
But also, think about how much more information you get about an individual who had listed on a dating site, much, much more information than you would get in a Yellow Pages ad. We never think twice about using the Yellow Pages to find a plumber, let’s say. We may ask a friend for recommendations, but we don’t blame the telephone or the directory if the plumber turns out to be a jerk. Nor do we never hire a plumber again. We use our judgment. We simply don’t use that plumber, and we go back to the phone book for another one.
We don’t throw out the phone book or the phone simply because we dialed a wrong number either.
The phone book is full of people who lie, cheat, and you wouldn’t want to marry. But the phone book also contains nice people, great folks, even, and we all know that. We know how to use the phone book as a tool to contact those folks, and we never even notice the listings we wouldn’t be interested in. We skip right over what we don’t want.
Don’t throw out the Internet equivalent of a phone book for singles, simply because you haven’t figured out how to use it to your advantage. Yes, Internet dating sites are much more sophisticated than a telephone directory, and therefore harder to learn how to use effectively, but the principal is the same. Dating sites list hundreds of thousands of singles, 99.9% of whom you will not be interested in. Same with phone books: 99.9% of the listings in the phone book you will never call and never want to. But that .01% you would be VERY interested in, and the phone book/ dating site allows you to find them.
The anger, disgust, disappointment that you may feel about looking for love online is not the fault of the dating site, that is, if you have picked a good, reputable one. Your frustration most probably is that you have not learned how to use the Internet and dating sites to get what you want. Or perhaps, what you want doesn’t exist, so you need to readjust what you are looking for. But the point is, the solution lies in you – and part of that solution may be getting help to learn what you don’t know about making online dating work for you. This is where hiring a coach can really pay off handsomely – just try me.

If you need more reasons to get going and get online to find love, here’s more good news: First off, online dating sites report huge surges in membership and traffic right after New Year’s, so now is the time to get your profile shaped up and ready for action.
Even better, the economic stresses are also pushing people to find love. Match.com reported the best November in seven years, and other dating sites are similarly reporting surges in traffic.
It’s probably no mystery about why activity is the best it has been in seven years: seven years ago was right after 9/11. That tragedy marked the beginning of online dating coming out of the closet and into the mainstream. In unsettled times, people yearn for family and connection. This is another one of those times.
Pick your dating site and get going. Or if you are already on a dating site, get active. Lots of new folks mean lots of new potential. Take advantage of it!

Folks complain about the costs of paid Internet dating sites like Match.com and Yahoo! Personals, but really, people, we are talking about a dollar a day or less. Even in bad financial times—in fact, BECAUSE of bad financial times—people look for love. Read what Pepper Schwartz has to say below—I LOVE Pepper Schwartz:
Does Love Come Economy-Sized in a Downsized Economy?
SEATTLE, Nov 11, 2008 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/—Leading Relationship Expert reveals dating behaviors during uncertain times.
Results show spike in online dating as economy takes a nose-dive
Many things get downsized to survive a recession. Love, however, isn’t one of them. In uncertain economic times, people are actually turning to online dating services more than ever to find lasting, loving relationships, as studies have shown that married people are often healthier and have less stress than singles, and that two can potentially live just as cost-efficiently as one.
“One of the hardest emotional feelings is being in the midst of bad news by yourself,” said Dr. Pepper Schwartz, chief relationship expert for leading dating site Perfectmatch.com. “We are all generally better as a team and appreciate someone who shares our values, goals and lifestyle, and that’s why we’ve seen increased traffic to top dating sites in the current economic climate.” Schwartz went on to say that looking for love online isn’t too expensive or time-consuming, potentially costing the same as stopping for a muffin and latte once a week.

Steve Penner writes some interesting dating columns for SeacoastOnline.com. I’ve posted his stuff before, take a look: On Heightism, This Guy Knows. Here he goes again, talking about stigma about online dating and dating services. Read my previous entry where I take on Dr. Joyce—actually, she did a half okay job. Worries about being discovered online? Hey, get over it. This is 2008, for goodness sake!
Does a dating service ‘stigma’ still exist?
By Steve Penner
November 21, 2008 6:00 AM
When I first started the dating service LunchDates in 1982, scores of single men and women immediately contacted us and expressed an interest in joining.
The timing was perfect, as the disco era was ending and the divorce rate was peaking. The women’s movement was coming into its own, with many women deciding to delay marriage to pursue careers, not just jobs. While achieving career success, a decent percentage of these women suddenly found themselves approaching 30 and unmarried.
Initially I spoke with many singles who decided not to join. They just couldn’t pull the trigger; in 1982 the stigma attached to the concept of joining a dating service was too ingrained for them to overcome.
I recall talking to many men and women who indicated they really wanted to join, the price was not a problem, but then they expressed the following excuses:
* “I just can’t bring myself to pay money to meet someone.”
* “What if I join and my friends find out?
* “I’m not that desperate.”
* “I can’t picture the type of woman I want to meet joining a dating service!”
* “I can’t picture the type of man I want to meet joining a dating service!”
I firmly believe that my favorite whipping boy, the media, was somewhat responsible for creating and reinforcing this stigma. Whenever a single person in a movie or television show indicated they wanted to meet someone, lo and behold in the next scene they just happened to bump into an eligible member of the opposite sex while strolling down the aisle of a supermarket or waiting at a bus stop.
These shows conveyed the message that you are not supposed to overtly try and meet someone, only desperate losers do that. No, you are just supposed to hang tight and inevitably Mr. or Ms. Right’s shopping cart will bump into yours.
If the plot of a television show or movie ever included a dating service, it usually involved a serial killer, who was knocking off the women he was meeting.
Eventually though, the stigma began to fade, and hundreds and eventually thousands of adult single men and women joined LunchDates. What changed?
Throughout the 1980s and into the ‘90s many people who did join found success and began referring their friends, co-workers and relatives. The typical person who called LunchDates usually said something like “I never thought I would join a dating service, but I just discovered that is how my cousin met his fiancée.”
One inquiry came from a woman who was the executive assistant to her hot-shot boss, the CEO of a rather large Boston company. For a few months she had been relaying calls from one of our counselors, who was arranging dates for him. Once she figured out what was happening, she thought that if her boss was using a dating service, she might as well give it a try.
Still though, the stigma persisted to some extent into this millennium.
One of my favorite newspaper columnists (other than me of course) is Craig Wilson, whose column, “The Final Word,” appears every Wednesday in the Life section of USA Today.
A few years ago Craig wrote a column (I just looked it up, it was Nov. 9, 2004 ...; isn’t the Internet great?) advising his single readers to stop trying so hard to meet someone. His specific advice was that singles should not be proactive and should just rely on fate. He wrote:
“I hate to dash anyone’s hopes here, but finding the right guy is mostly chance. Most anyone will tell you that. He almost always shows up when you’re least expecting him. Sometimes you don’t even want to meet someone when, all of a sudden, there he stands right before you as if to say, ‘Well, here I am!’ I met my partner, Jack, 20 years ago this month while standing in line at the National Gallery of Art.”
I immediately e-mailed Craig. “Telling single readers that ‘finding the right guy’ is mostly chance is exactly the type of bad advice that someone already in a happy relationship for decades would write,” I wrote. “The whole ‘just rely on fate’ suggestion is an outdated one that movies and television shows love to promote.”
I then reiterated my claim that singles do not have creative script writers looking out for them, and I concluded by chastising him:
“Many of those singles who take your advice will wind up watching the days, months, and years roll by, while they stay home on Saturday nights watching rented Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan videos and dreaming about ‘bumping’ into someone in line.”
How did Wilson respond? He sent back a sarcastic reply insinuating I was just trying to promote my dating service, stating “I was wondering when the pitch line was coming ...; Very clever ...;”
And so columnists like Craig Wilson continue to promote the “just rely on fate” theory.
But I am pleased to report that many single and divorced people across this country (and probably abroad) have realized that a proactive approach to finding love actually works. Over the last decade the boom in Internet dating services and such innovative approaches as Meetup.com and speed dating have proven very effective. Sure there is a level of chance involved and finding someone very special is a numbers game.
But you can’t win the lottery unless you buy a ticket. And the odds of meeting someone at a dating service or speed dating event are FAR better than playing your dog’s birthday on a Megabucks ticket.
At speed dating or at a dating service, you are pretty much assured that every person you meet is single, available, AND looking. If you know how to “play the game,” you can narrow the odds by requesting only to meet someone in a certain age range or someone who shares similar values along with a love of the outdoors.
As I have written before, finding a mate for life is the most important “acquisition” of a person’s life. Unfortunately some people still put more research and effort into buying a camera or a computer than they do looking for a potential spouse. (Probably disciples of Craig Wilson.)
But today, in 2008, the only stigma any single person should feel is when telling friends that your efforts to meet someone are limited to hanging out at a Laundromat or waiting in line at the supermarket.

Here’s a letter I ran across in a Dr. Joyce column that I hear over and over again from new clients, in one version or another. Read through the letter and then see my comments below:
DEAR DR. BROTHERS: I am a divorced mom in my late 40s. I have two kids in high school, and although I haven’t dated much since their father remarried, I am interested in meeting someone, perhaps on the Internet. My problem is that I am afraid to post a description, put up a photo, meet someone or even send an e-mail. I keep thinking that if my teens were to see what I am doing, they would be very embarrassed. Can I ever overcome this paralysis, and if so, how?—B.A.
DEAR B.A.: Wow. You seem to be completely paralyzed by the prospect of Internet dating—so I wonder why the idea is even attractive to you. It almost seems as though you have picked a way of meeting people and dating that you can’t possibly feel comfortable doing, and so you have found a good reason for doing nothing. Staying home and not rocking the boat will not have any possibility of embarrassment for your kids—but it may have downsides that you don’t want to acknowledge. It’s OK to want to date several years after being divorced—your ex-husband has moved on and even remarried; presumably, your kids aren’t freaked out about that.
It seems like you want to date but for some reason are mired in guilt and fear of the unknown. It is admirable that you are so aware of your responsibilities as a mother and role model for your children, but you may be overestimating their interest in your personal life. They probably just want you to be happy, and as long as you conduct yourself like the good person they know you to be, there is little to fear. But I bet if you were to sit down and talk to them about it now, you’d find they will encourage you. Perhaps you should start out without the computer though, since you seem to be so frightened of the experience. Ask friends for introductions, then go from there.
Okay, I am back. Just about everyone, but in particular, women, have a very hard time getting started with Internet dating. The directness of posting an ad and a photo, along with a descriptive statement that acknowledges your desire for love seems so embarrassing, public, and distasteful. Women feels this somewhat more so than men, but men worry too. I think at least part of the difficulty for women, those of us who are a little older than 40, is that we had such strong messages about not showing interest in men or sex. If a guy pursued anyway, well, great, but for heaven’s sake, don’t let them know you are interested.
Also, interest in dating means putting most vulnerable self out there with little protection from hurt. So it is normal to feel considerable ambivalence (both yes and no) about getting started. I think that Dr. Joyce got the part right that the woman in question should talk to her children and let them know what she is thinking about, and I too bet they would encourage her. Young people now are far less inhibited about sex and love that we were, and they have little worry at all about the Internet.
Dr. Joyce’s second part of advice, to get her friends to set her up, is horrid, though! Talk about feeling public! Venturing onto Internet dating sites is much safer and protective of the ego, and there are ways to ease your way in without becoming front page news in your own home town. If you want to know how, just ask me.

I’ve said any number of times that Internet dating is the closest grownup singles have to the experience of being in college. College is the last time you probably were in an environment where just about everyone was single and looking. Little did we know then that things were going to change big time one we left for the real world. This column below is from “The Flat Head” out of the College of William and Mary. The author, Maya Horowitz, speaks with wisdom from the other side—she is still an undergrad, it seems, but recognizes what a good deal college people have when it comes to finding sex. She also correctly recognizes that the next best thing to being in college when you are a grownup is Internet dating. Yes, as she goes on later, online dating is not perfect and has its hazards, but for those of us over 21, it’s the best thing to happen yet.
Jeez, though, when I was in college, our paper NEVER had columns like this one....
Behind Closed Doors: College: the perfect sexual paradise
By Maya Horowitz
My Thanksgiving break was marred by a harrowing look into our collective sexual future. All of what I’m about to say may be obvious, but I think it bears repeating because most of us forget to think about it.
College is the sexual jackpot. Granted, the College of William and Mary may not be the orgiastic sexual Valhalla that some of us would like it to be, but we’ve still got things pretty good. With around 5,000 undergraduates, the vast majority of whom are unmarried, finding a coital partner should be as easy as pie (apple pie that’s warm and gooey inside).
Now, maybe it hasn’t been so easy for you so far. But let’s just take a step back and think about this for a second. The sexual environment on the College’s campus is unlike anywhere else. There are thousands of us, independent for the first time in our lives, stuck together in the middle of colonial-nowhere with very little responsibility and a lot of free time. All of our bodies are young, hot, supple, panting, panting, panting, searching, waiting, expecting, seeking release …
Ahem, I may have digressed. The point is that there are a lot of good-looking people (it’s easy to be beautiful when you’re young and healthy) living in close quarters. The chances of you living in a sexual environment as fertile as this one ever again are very slim. When we graduate, the balloon bursts (and not in a sexy, cherry-popping sort of way).
If you attend graduate school, you may be surrounded by a large number of individuals again, but many of them will be older or married. Those who are not will still probably have their own thing going on. Chances are, you won’t be attending loose sexual dance parties themed “bros and hos” when you’re 25.
As a working professional, you can’t expect your colleagues to be young, single or ready-to-mingle. You may meet singles at bars, but you’re entering at your own risk. You have no way of knowing anything about the random hottie you approach. At least here, when you’re at the delis, you can expect the chick you’re approaching to be a little nerdy, very smart and touchy about the whole “applying to UVA” thing.
What it comes down to is that the real world is scary. As in, scary because there aren’t enough opportunities for safe fucking.
The beacon of hope for our generation is online dating. Services such as match.com and eHarmony are becoming more and more popular. Most of you probably scoff at the idea of using one of these services, but the stigma of needing help in the dating scene is being sloughed off in favor of a modern approach to seeking a mate. Many of my older friends and family have used these services successfully.
But, here’s the catch: Online dating is vicious. You may be matched on 1,500 levels of compatibility, but the first thing prospective daters do is check out all of your pictures. Even with Myspace angles, sepia tinting and sixty different shots of your gorgeous face, a dater may find one picture they don’t like and fixate on it. Or they might check out what you’ve written about yourself and decide that you don’t seem that great.
When you meet someone in person, you get the benefit of the doubt. Your personality and charm may win them over, even if they’re not used to dating girls who are taller than 5’6’’. Online dating essentially allows people to filter out potential mates for idiotic reasons. Sure, I’d love to date a man with a body that looks like it’s cut from marble, but in real life I’m going to give the guy with a few extra pounds a chance. Whereas on match.com, I’d probably click away and never look back.
Here’s an example: What if you are a mustached divorcee who is a former smoker with six kids. Gross, right? I would never go out with a man of that description. But if I met Brad Pitt in person, I’d probably rip my clothes off and tell him to park his pink rocket ship in my garage of love immediately.
The lesson of today’s sermon is: Enjoy the college life while you can. I have looked into the crystal ball that is my older cousins’ and siblings’ dating lives, and the future ain’t pretty. Or, at least, it didn’t seem pretty from its eHarmony profile pictures.

Right after 9/11, traffic to dating sites surged as singles responded emotionally to the tragedy. The explanation seemed to be a yearning for connection, stability and home. Here we are again, this time in a financial crisis, and again, the traffic on the dating sites is WAY up, as much as 47%. What’s the message? This is a great time to get online and get active. Lots of new people with renewed interest in finding love. Maybe with you.
Traffic to dating sites is way up since September
By Heidi Dawley
There are plenty of things folks cut back on during an economic downturn, and TV and newspaper reports are full of them: We eat at fancy restaurants less, buy fewer new cars, and hold back on spontaneous purchasing, to name just a few.
There’s more cooking at home, more bargain-hunting and coupon-clipping, more vacations nearby.
But folks are also cutting back where one might not expect it, and one is in the search for love. Searchers of romance, it turns out, are skipping the bar scene and all the expense that entails in favor of going online to hunt out the next love of their lives.
A number of online dating services are reporting that their subscriber numbers have soared since September’s stock market turmoil hit.
“We have found that in the last three months, in September, October, November, that we have had a real jump in the numbers of people subscribing for membership,” says Jackie Elton, founder and managing director of Christian Connection, a London-based online dating service. It reports that its revenues in those months were up about 40 percent year on year.
Other online dating companies also have noted a rise. In the U.S., Perfectmatch.com also said in November that the number of members is up 47 percent compared to last quarter.
And Avalanche.com, which owns Date.com, Matchmaker.com and Amor.com, reports a similar trend, with revenue up 17 percent year on year and membership up 26 percent.
“It’s hard to know exactly why the numbers are going up, but yes, I feel that this surge is related to the recent worldwide economic crisis,” says Avalanche CEO Meir Strahlberg.
Hitwise, the online measurement firm, says the traffic for the online dating category was up in October compared to the same month the year before, although it puts the figure at a smaller 3 percent.
For the online dating industry, this is only the second economic downturn that has come around since these sites first appeared on the scene.
The first time, was after 9/11. The impact was similar then, too. “After 9/11 there was a tremendous surge in activity,” says Strahlberg.
With numbers shooting up during this downturn, folks at the online dating sites are beginning to think online dating is a countercyclical business, in other words one that manages to do well during an economic downturn.
“We feel that our business model is tested, and online dating is one of the few industries that is recession proof,” says Strahlberg.
So just why should this be? There are number reasons why online dating service bosses think the rotten economy might actually be boosting their business.
For one thing, people are likely to be economizing by staying home more. This leads to a few things. First, they may feel a bit lonely at home on their own.
What’s more, while at home there’s more time to surf online dating sites, looking at profiles. “The thing about online dating is that takes some effort. You have to get on there, make a good profile, see who’s on there. It isn’t a casual thing,” says Christian Connection’s Elton.
Then there’s the fact that if people are cutting back on spending, they won’t want to be splashing out in bars trying to meet someone.
Nor will they want to spend a lot on dates where there’s no chemistry. In fact, 48 percent of people polled recently by Avalanche said that the recent economic downturn meant they were sending more time online getting to know a prospective date before actually setting up a face-to-face date.
But there are a few other reasons too. When there is a time of crisis either relating to security or the economy, people tend to re-evaluate what is important in their lives. Suddenly material possessions don’t rate as high, while relationships and home life gain in importance.
What’s more, when things get tough, people don’t want to be alone. “There’s comfort in being in someone else’s company,” says Strahlberg.

This is such a nice, positive piece about Internet dating that I just had to post it here. The author has it just right: Online dating is what you make it to be. See her suggestions below…
Whats Online Dating? And How to Make Online Dating Work For You
Submitted by ricky776 on October 24, 2008
There seems to be two distinct opinions about online dating in existence today. The first is that it is a fantastic service that caters to the modern man and woman that does not have the time to conventionally date or wises to screen dates first. The second is more negative and seems to imply that online dating is in fact a scam or worse, a marketplace for the sad, lonely and weird. No matter which camp you fall into now, if you ever have a good experience on a dating site then you will perceive it in a whole new light.
In actual fact, your online dating experience depends on what you make of it. You have to make the experience work for you as opposed to the other way around. You should be proactive and cease the opportunity presented to you with both hands. The tips below will help you to make the most of online dating and find exactly what you are looking for at the same time.
1. Choose A Positive Approach - Never join a dating site thinking it will be a disaster. Online dating will be a disaster for you if you take that approach because you will not allow yourself to enjoy the experience. Look upon it as a bit of fun that could lead to some lasting friendships and perhaps a little love. Amy negativity or contempt you feel for others on there will shine right through and you will not get anything from the experience at all.
2. Keep An Open Mind - Never judge a book by its cover, and never judge the person you meet on the site via one email or conversation. Take the time to get to know the individual a little before you make up your mind about someone. Everyone wants to make a good first impression and so will be nervous. Allow at least a couple of conversations before you judge.
3. Take It At Your Own Pace - Do not rush into anything. If you do not feel ready to concentrate on one person then do not do it. If you wish to keep your options open then say you are looking for friendship rather than a relationship. Never commit to anything before you are ready because it really could burn you later if you do.
4. Remain Mysterious - Only ever reveal the details about yourself that you are happy for individuals that you have never met before to know. If you do not want to use your date of birth then stick to the month and year. If you want to be known by a nickname then you can be. Never give your address or phone number out at all. This is all for your own safety as much as for the sake of the experience. Just relax and enjoy it but never put yourself in danger.

You know, I’ve been helping folks find love online for a long time now, and watched as online dating moved from the shadows into full respectability. But I am still astounded that some singles resist the best show in town for finding love. Here’s a good basic article for those who remain to be convinced....
Love online 20 million people visit at least one online dating service every month. What are they all looking for?
By CAROLINE DOHACK of the Tribune’s staff
Published Sunday, November 2, 2008
Traditionally, we meet our partners through venues that serve as common bonds — school, work, church — or through family and friends. But as many are discovering, online dating has its own advantages.
Find your match
How many fish are in the sea? Probably as many as there are online dating services. Here is a breakdown of a few of them:
eHarmony: After filling out a lengthy personality survey, the site will find potential matches using a patented compatibility matchmaking system. This is a subscription-based service geared toward people seeking long-term relationships. http://www.eharmony.com.
Craigslist: Craigslist is a great way to find a sofa, concert tickets or lawn-mowing service. It also has personal ads. But because users can post in anonymity, you might find a little bit more than you were looking for. In other words, don’t cruise these ads at work. columbiamo.craigslist.org.
OmniDate: If you find instant messaging potential paramours to be a little impersonal, this site allows you to chat using animated avatars. There is a limited selection of avatars, so your virtual date will probably look more like a fantasy date. But if you’ve always wanted to be a blonde but feared the peroxide, this might be the way to go. http://www.omnidate.com.
Crazy Blind Date: For the truly brave, this site sets you up with someone at the last minute and arranges a time and place for you to meet. This service is only available in certain cities, but if you find yourself lonely when you go out of town, keep this one bookmarked. http://www.crazyblinddates.com.
Geek 2 Geek: The name says it all. In addition to some of the usual online profile questions, you get to pick your favorite video game console and tag interests such as anime, superheroes, sci-fi and computers. http://www.gk2gk.com.
Passions Network: Hey, you know what you like. This site allows you to set up niche dating accounts. If you’re looking for a vegan bicyclist who loves pirates and punk music, you can be as picky as you want here. http://www.passionsnetwork.com.
According to data from Online Dating magazine, a consumer watchdog publication for online daters, more than 20 million people visit at least one online dating service a month, and more than 120,000 marriages occur each year as a result of online dating.
“Online dating is the best thing to ever happen to shy people,” said Joe Tracy, publisher of Online Dating. “They get to know someone via the computer, and then they feel more comfortable meeting them personally.”
Furthermore, there might not be many people looking for partners at those traditional meeting venues, Tracy said. “When you go online, you know there are people looking for the same thing,” he said.
Dave Evans, founder and editor of onlinedatingpost.com and a consultant to online dating consumers and industry members, likens dating to job hunting. You still want to meet people, but you also look for other ways to make yourself known. “Your profile is your résumé. You want to get out there and share it,” Evans said.
Online dating also gives people the chance to search for people with similar interests.
“If you’re the type of person who dresses up as a Klingon on Halloween and you actually know the Klingon language, you can find somebody who matches those exact interests,” Tracy said.
And for many, finding a partner with similar interests and attributes is important. Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that online daters often seek partners with qualities similar to those they reported on their own profiles. It’s not that people are looking for carbon copies of themselves. Rather, they want to feel comfortable with a potential partner. Someone with blue eyes won’t be going outside his or her comfort zone by dating someone with brown eyes, the study said, but smokers might have a more vested interest in seeking other smokers.
But getting outside those comfort zones opens up more possibilities. Maybe you like hip-hop, and she likes classical music. “Does that mean we’re not right for each other?” Evans said.
Still, some people prefer niche dating services, which narrow the selection by focusing on a hobby, lifestyle, religion or other aspect of life. For instance, JDate.com is a popular site for Jewish singles.
What kind of dating site is best for you? Consider your goals. If you’re just looking for something casual, free services such as Yahoo! Personals have the most users. But for those seeking serious, long-term relationships, paid sites such as eHarmony.com tend to attract like-minded people.
Once you decide on a site, here are some tips for making the connection:
● Get a new e-mail address specifically for online-dating correspondence, and don’t use your full name. You don’t want anyone using that information to track you down.
● For safety’s sake, don’t include identifying information such as phone number, last name or place of employment. If you have children, don’t post their photos or include too much information about them. “You’re putting this information out, and anybody in the world can read it,” Tracy said.
● Post a photo, preferably one that actually looks like you. Researchers at the University of Chicago found women who posted photos received twice as many e-mails than those who did not, and men who posted photos received 50 percent more e-mails.
● Write for whom you hope to attract. If you value a sense of humor, convey it through your profile. If you like a certain genre of movies, include little references. Your best matches will understand what you mean.
● Avoid clichés. This will help you stand out. “What people don’t realize is you’re seen in a series,” Evans said. “I’ve looked at 20 women before you, and I’ll look at 20 women after you.”
● Be truthful. You never know when a lie will come back to bite you.
● Be positive. Statements like “my last relationship left me emotionally scarred and cynical” won’t get you anywhere.
● Use spell-check.
Finally, if you’re worried about being judged for looking online, a survey by the Pew Internet & American Life Project Report found that only 29 percent of Internet users surveyed believe online daters “are in dire dating straits.” But these respondents, according to the report, tend to have less online experience and are less trusting of people in general.
Most view online dating as a way to use technology to enhance their lives.
“It’s another arrow in the quiver of opportunities to meet somebody,” Evans said.

I’m not a complete fan of AskMen.com, but let’s face it, it’s written for (young) guys, and maybe they’ll glean some wisdom between the sales pitches for “The System.” This following letter and answer is a good example. I’ve underlined what I think are the gems, and particularly like the summing up: “exchange e-mails, then ask for the home phone number and a 45-minute date at Starbucks.”
Doc Love on AskMen.com gives some great advice to guys on how to use Internet dating to meet women:
reader’s question
Hey Doc,
Thanks for your years of great service to men. I am an adherent of “The System,” which you so humorously and effectively speak of in your weekly column. Now I’ve become addicted to your radio show, too. What are the chances that you’ll become syndicated? I think that we can all do with a dose of your advice!
I’ve been thinking about starting to use Match.com to meet women. It seems that these days the bar and club scene is dead, and instead everybody is online getting dates. I don’t know if it’s an effective way of meeting women, but it seems to be worth a shot since that’s where the game is, right?
So here’s my question: Do you have any suggestions for what to say when contacting a woman on Match.com? In fact, can you give us guys a blueprint for how to do it? In other words, what do you say in your intro, the next paragraph and the next paragraph, and how do you wrap it up? I’m okay when I meet a woman face to face, but frankly, I’m not exactly sure how to deal with her when I can’t see her. It seems to put a guy at a disadvantage.
Here’s something else: The women’s screen names are usually not their real names. Is it a good idea to go after their real names right away, or should I let that come later when a beachhead has been established?
Also, are there any signs to look for when exchanging e-mail with Match.com women? Now that I think of it, the question I guess I’m really asking is how can you gauge a woman’s Interest Level across the computer? Don’t you really have to be in a female’s presence to accurately assess it?
I’m asking you this now before I actually take the plunge. Like you always say, it’s better to be completely prepared before going out on the battlefield.
Thanks, Doc. Looking forward to your response.
Jared - who feels awkward at the computer terminal
Hi Jared,
I really appreciate what you said about me, and thank you for being so supportive. But I want you to do me an enormous favor. It’s extremely important that you set “The System” by your bed and read it every night. And remember to do it for the rest of your life, even after 35 years of marriage. It’s the most airtight safeguard you can give yourself when it comes to dealing with women, and its principles are eternal.
But let’s get back to meeting her…
Here’s the truth about the bar and club scene: It’s not the greatest place to meet women. It’s too dark, there’s too much smoke, too much booze flowing, and that’s when people have a tendency to tell lies. If you go out to a club, you want to be there with your buddies, having fun talking about the good old days, boxing, business, and, of course, women. But if you happen to see somebody you dig in a bar or club, you have to ask her to dance. But don’t go there hoping to pick up Miss Right. The odds aren’t good.
Jared, online is where the dating game is these days, make no mistake about it, and in front of the terminal screen is where you have to be. Even my Uncle Jethro Love says “Boy, you’s dead in the water with the girls without your Macintosh!”. But before you log on, you have to be prepared and you have to have a very strict game plan.
And the aim of this plan is to get the girl through the door of Starbucks. There you are at home, pal, with just your laptop and no girlfriend, and your goal is to eventually say: “Caprice, very nice to meet you! Have a seat.”
When she arrives, you buy her a Mocha Valencia and you talk for 45 minutes. Afterwards, you walk her out to her car and she says, “Wow, Jared, I had a nice time! Please give me a call and we’ll get together again.” Then she hugs you, gets into her car and drives away. Guys, if we’re going to sell ourselves, we have to get the buyer in front of us for 45 minutes at Starbucks.
So here’s what you say when you’re at the keyboard. Since the ladies always ask what you’re looking for, you’re going to tell them, “I’m looking for a Self-Reliant, Flexible Giver who will laugh at my corny jokes. Let’s meet at Starbucks and see if I can make you giggle.” There’s your icebreaker.
You want a blueprint? A piece of cake. Like my cousin Fast Eddie Love says, “The point is to make ‘em laugh and tell ‘em nothin’.” If you get a positive response on Match.com—a wink—toss into your e-mail that you’re a busy guy and that you have tons of fun on the weekends. In your second paragraph, keep on keeping it light. Does she like to dance? Does she like to travel to Vegas or New York? What babe doesn’t like to dance or go places? Then ask her about Match.com to remind her that you don’t want to just be her e-mail “buddy.”
Jared, you’re afraid of the wrong things. The fact is that it’s a lot easier to deal with a woman when you can’t see her. You’re most definitely not at a disadvantage, because on the Internet you can check out up to 200 pictures within a half-hour. Then you pare it down to 45 or so, and out of that 45 you give the best ones a wink. You’re going to dance back and forth with a few e-mails, then you will go in for the home phone number.
And she’s going to say (hopefully), “Here it is,” or “I’ll give it to you when we meet.” Then you have to get her to show up for her coffee. Make sure you give her the Starbucks telephone number and detailed directions, and that the place has plenty of parking because a lot of these girls won’t show if they have the slightest excuse.
As far as her onscreen name goes, if she wants to call herself “Anita The Hun,” that’s her right. You’ll get her real name if she’s really interested.
So to sum it up, break the ice, exchange e-mails, then ask for the home phone number and a 45-minute date at Starbucks. Of course you can’t completely gauge a woman’s Interest Level over a computer, but to you Psych majors, the more detailed her responses are to your e-mails, the easier she makes it for you to contact her in person. And the more questions she asks you, you can bet her Interest Level is clinically alive.
Remember: Some women will meet a guy for coffee. When she walks in the door, you’ll witness her female presence in the flesh. Then you’ll sit down with her for a chat, and it’ll be easy to assess whether she likes you or thinks you’re the worst thing since Osama Bin Laden.
When it comes to being completely prepared before going onto the battlefield, like my cousin Brother Love down in Watts says, “Amen, Bro!”.
Remember, guys: If you don’t go packing, you can’t go off to war.

Back in January 2006, I wrote a blog post that said eHarmony claimed 90 singles a day were marrying because of eHarmony. This article below says the numbers are now 236 people marrying a day who met on eHarmony. I’m not a big fan of eHarmony, but you can’t argue with success. What are the stats for Match.com and Yahoo! Personals?
eHarmony says its goal is not just to find users dates—It wants them to get married. In fact, the company claims that 236 people a day in the U.S. are married as a result of meeting through their site.
Part of a comment on OnlinePersonalsWatch by Evan Chase:
...while some men find eHarmony a pain in the butt due to all its hoops in guided communication, I actually like it and find it a must have for men dating online.
It’s actually more efficient due to the fact that you don’t have to be creative about your answers until long in to the communication process. How many different ways can you answer, “Your Idea of adventure is?”

I like this article that just came out in the Boston Globe. It features just the folks I write for and coach, those singles over 35 or 40 who want to find the love of their lives. Too bad the author didn’t find me, because as you all know, I found my love on Match.com, am a Romance Coach, and am from Maine—so is Stacey Chase! Oh well, maybe next time. But anyway, back to the article. I LOVED how the author treated the gay male couple exactly as she would have a heterosexual couple, right down to the question of getting married. I do think that the women’s expectations of the guys at the dating event were too high. Go easy, ladies. Thye may not see you as that much of a catch, either.
Older, Wiser, and Available The middle-aged dating scene, filled with singles weighing one another’s emotional baggage, isn’t for the weak of heart.
By Stacey Chase
July 27, 2008
IT’S A MONDAY NIGHT AND Gretchen Grufman, a home remodeler with freckles and strawberry-blond hair, has just met eight men in a series of six-minute “predates” - the romantic round robin better known as speed dating - at a Portsmouth, New Hampshire, sports bar. There was the soft-spoken, baldheaded Briton; the goateed general contractor who loves ballroom dancing; the 48-year-old grandfather of seven in a suit; and the Harley-riding IT manager who divorced a second time three months ago. * Single since 1992, Grufman is herself twice divorced with two grown sons. “I’ve been engaged a few times, but I haven’t worked up the courage to get married again,” says the 55-year-old who recently moved to Amesbury from Wells, Maine. Still, middle-aged dating is not for the faint of heart. Baby boomers like her, born between 1946 and 1964, are more likely than previous generations were to find themselves - graying and with badly bruised egos - on the youth-obsessed dating scene. The high incidence of divorce, declining marriage rates, and longer life spans have contributed to the single-boomer phenomenon. An AARP analysis of 2007 US Census Bureau data found that of the 76.7 million baby boomers, 18.5 percent were divorced or separated, 10.6 percent had never married, and 2.8 percent were widowed, making nearly a third of the generation (24.5 million) single.
“Fifty, 60 years ago, dating among this age group would be unheard of,” says 46-year-old Mary Elizabeth Hughes, a demographer at Johns Hopkins University and coauthor of a 2004 study The Lives and Times of the Baby Boomers. “Most people would already be married, and if they weren’t married they probably weren’t dating.”
For those looking for love with like-minded and like-aged people today, it’s a brave new world often complicated by love-gone-wrong histories with ex-spouses or lovers, and by children and grandchildren, dependent elderly parents, careers, health problems, and emotional baggage that won’t fit into the overhead compartment. Framingham State College sociology professor Virginia Rutter says all that can be good: “The baggage is actually part of what makes the person you’re with a human being, and you have this opportunity to connect with them in the middle of the plot of their story.”
Many older daters, like those at the speed-dating event sponsored by Cupid.com/PreDating, are embracing Cupid and other online dating sites like Match.com and eHarmony.com. Though helped along by modern technology, much of the conversation Monday night was painfully predictable: weather and work. One man mentioned the diarrhea outbreak at his mother’s assisted-living facility. Another told Grufman afterward that he’d frequented a strip club in her old town.
Sally LaRochelle, a 49-year-old two-time divorcee and administrative assistant in Dover, New Hampshire, sporting ultra short white hair and dark-rimmed glasses, was turned off by the potential suitors. “On a scale of one to 10 . . . they’re probably like twos,” she says. “They seemed a little desperate, and some of them just seemed to be too old.”
The newly re-divorced IT manager, Charlie Petrikas, 56, from South Berwick, Maine, confesses: “I still think I do need to heal a bit, but I don’t want to sit around.”
Susan Fox owns Personals Work in the South End, a matchmaking service that provides its largely female boomer clientele with tools such as ghostwriting personal ads and flirting and style tips for finding a mate. Says Fox: “I’ve even told women who’ve come in that they need to color their hair.” She helps singles to first figure out who they are and what they’re seeking - physical characteristics, occupation, religion, interests, smoking habits - and then create a list of “non-negotiables” for Mr. or Ms. Right, often disregarding a client’s “wish list.” (One client rattled off 142 deal breakers and, needless to say, was not a success story.)
Her advice? Forget love at first sight. Take a second look - and a third, and a fourth.
“We’re not all pulled together with the same level of hormonal urgency that we were when we were 27 or 33,” says the 50-something Fox. “People really need to be able to say, `OK. I like this person well enough to see him or her again and see if something develops here.’”
Bostonian Beverly Summer is a slender brunette in her mid-40s, never married, childless, Ivy League-educated, and runs her own financial-services company. “If I were a guy,” she quips, “I would be the most eligible bachelor in Boston.”
Having tried everything from charity events to pub crawls, Summer turned to Personals Work two years ago in her hard-charging hunt for a husband. Since then, she has viewed dozens of profiles and dated two men from Match.com, going out for several months with each of them, but she still hasn’t met The One. “There’s no science to it,” she says. “It’s a just a matter of time, kissing frogs.”
THEY SPARKED THE SEXUAL REVOLUTION, but for many boomers - those in the first wave are turning 62, while late boomers are hitting 44 this year - reentering the dating game, sometimes after decades, or continuing to search despite long odds, is both unnerving and liberating in ways that hooking up in their younger days was not. “The romance of your 20s - whether you actually decide to have children or not - is the script about how, especially in the heterosexual ideal, we get together, and we make a family, and we have our little dream world,” says the 44-year-old Rutter, who became a widow at age 35. “That is no longer on the table when you’re in your 40s, 50s, and 60s.”
By shedding stereotypical gender roles, Rutter says, midlifers have a lot more freedom to be themselves, and romance becomes less of a fantasy than a practicality that involves negotiating complexities such as child-custody arrangements, retirement planning, and medical directives. “That isn’t less romantic,” she says, “but the romance is different.”
Michael Walsh, a 50-year-old landscape designer in Braintree, and his partner, David Richman, 52, of Aventura, Florida, had a whirlwind courtship after viewing each other’s profiles on Match.com on October 2, 2006. That Monday night, they exchanged e-mails. Tuesday morning, they talked by phone. On Friday, Walsh was picking up Richman, a commercial property manager, at Logan Airport. By Sunday, they were in love.
The blissful pair, who currently maintain separate homes in their respective states (and another in Seattle), are together roughly 70 percent of the time. They have yet to decide whether they’ll marry, or to work out the logistics - primarily their careers and assets - in order to live in the same city. “My home is where David is,” Walsh says, “and his home is where I am.”
“It’s such a relief [not to be looking anymore] because that was my life - I was always looking for a partner,” continues Walsh, who eats only organic food and advertised himself on Match as Upbeat Buddhist Jock Seeks Attachment. “Other people stop looking; they give up.”
Boomers still on a quest for a mature, meaningful relationship say they have learned from their mistakes and heartaches and - though the peer dating pool is significantly smaller - seem to even cherish the peculiar bittersweetness of middle-aged love: that the biological urge to reproduce is typically over, that expectations of love are more realistic, that women tend to have a greater level of equality, that partners understand neither person will be molded to fit the other’s desires.
“With the mush comes the gloom,” Richman says. “I want to be able to be naked in front of somebody . . . and be completely comfortable. And naked in even more than the physical sense, emotionally be naked.”
Annie McCormick, a 51-year-old graphic artist in Burlington, Vermont, has had her heart repeatedly ripped out in a series of long-term, monogamous relationships since her 1984 divorce. “I tend to choose men who have addiction problems,” she says. “One cheated. One was violent. One was an alcoholic who drank. And, then, the last one was a pothead.”
McCormick blames herself, not the men. “I’m not honest from the start, as far as: `This is me. These are my needs,’ “ she says, “I’m a people pleaser.” Five years ago, after she and her last, live-in boyfriend split, McCormick says she “kind of went into hiding” but is timorously ready to seek love again. “I do get lonely lately, a little bit.”
Boomers, who took the first birth-control pills and campaigned for women’s rights, are leading active sex lives, surveys show, but those out of practice and on the prowl can be as nervous as fumbling teenagers when it comes to physical intimacy. “Generally, for people who are widowed or gone through a really painful divorce, there’s a fear,” says Fox, the matchmaker and a trained psychologist. Others are free-lovebirds who want “to get back out there and have sex to kind of get them in the swing of things again.”
“I’ve worked with women clients who regularly have sex on the first date!” she adds. “And older boomers!”
In 2004, a sexuality study by AARP revealed that slightly more than a third of the midlife and older respondents - and half of those with regular sexual partners - reported having sexual intercourse once a week or more. In addition, 53 percent said they engage in sexual touching or caressing, while 69 percent reported they kiss or hug their partner on a regular basis.
Leonard Steinhorn, a communications professor at American University and author of The Greater Generation: In Defense of the Baby Boom Legacy, predicts boomers will continue to transform American society even as they age. “Boomers are going to also reinvent the idea of what it means to be elderly,” says the 52-year-old former political speechwriter. “They’re going to look at being elderly as being vital, as vigorous, as still irreverent. Boomers are going to grow old but stay young.”
They may, or may not, decide one is the loneliest number. Cathy Chamberlain, a 59-year-old human resources manager in South Burlington, Vermont, has had boyfriends but never gotten married or had children and says she’s committed to her singlehood. “The loss I feel is more the sense of family,” she says. “I have it with a variety of girlfriends - you create your own family - and I just don’t know what that’s going to look like 10, 15 years from now.”
Meanwhile, Grufman, the speed dater from Amesbury, continues her pursuit of a mate. On her Cupid.com score card, she selected the option “Let’s Talk!” over “No Thanks” for five of the eight men she’d recently met; three men indicated they would like to hear from her again. (She believes some of them didn’t pick her because they thought she was an actress or model hired as a ringer.)
“My uncles, and my dad, and my grandfathers all treated their wives like they were on pedestals,” Grufman says. “I don’t really expect to be on a pedestal, but I sure expect to be treated pretty good.”
Looking wistful in a dark corner of the bar, she adds: “I’m not an unhappy person, but I definitely don’t want to grow old alone.”

Here’s an article that highlights one of the advantages—and distinct changes—that online dating has brought to courtship and mating. And one of Internet datings BIG advantages: You know a lot about a person before you even make the first contact, because so much is revealed in their profile.
And just as so often a plus is also a minus, you can find out too much, as the article points out.
Facebook deletes much of the mystery from dating
By Heidi Stevens
Chicago Tribune
Article Launched: 06/04/2008 12:04:06 AM PDT
Oliver Pangborn hates Dave Matthews Band.
If you looooove Dave Matthews Band, Pangborn probably doesn’t want to date you. If you share his loathing, eh, drop him a line.
Gone are the days when it took a date, maybe two, to find out a person’s resume of likes and dislikes — favorite movie, favorite quotes, special causes. Online matchmaking sites rendered that notion quaint years ago, and now social networking sites are doing their part to obliterate it. “Facebook and MySpace are kind of robbing the mysteries out of dating,” said Pangborn, 30, who lives on Chicago’s Gold Coast. “You find out all these little things about people that you might otherwise let go. If I see someone’s favorite quote is a Dave Matthews lyric or favorite band is Jimmy Buffett, I automatically have an image of them. And it kind of lingers.”
Thanks to online profiles that list everything from salary range to current reading selections, we’ve gotten used to knowing someone’s vital stats before we even meet face to face. Has this changed the qualities we look for in a partner?
Are we becoming a society of mirror-image seekers?
Not quite, say some experts. But we are becoming more adept at linking ourselves to kindred spirits — and that’s a good thing.
“We know from research that opposites don’t really attract,” said Les Parrott, author, psychologist, family therapist and, most recently, online marital counselor for eHarmony Marriage. “The truth is we’re drawn to people that are like us, and the more we have in common — especially on matters that mean the most to us — the easier time we’re going to have.”
That doesn’t mean you should seek out your doppelganger. For one thing, he or she doesn’t exist. “There’s no such thing as the perfect match,” Parrott said. “Human beings are so complex. No matter how much you have in common, you’re going to have differences.”
Vive la difference
And besides, those differences are half the fun.
“We help each other become better human beings,” Parrott said. “You’re the proverbial sandpaper for each other’s rough edges. If you’re well-matched, you’re going to expand each other’s horizons.”
Pangborn admits he sometimes longs for the days when we weren’t armed with quite so much information.
“It kind of takes away those certain peccadilloes that become endearing later on,” Pangborn said. “If you see right away that they have an Elvis collection, you say ‘Oh, what a freak,’ instead of finding it out as this charming bit later on.”
Louise Baker, 43, met her boyfriend, Bob, on Match.com a little more than a year ago. She says she scanned profiles for a good lifestyle match, rather than a reflection of her own interests.
“I wanted to first find someone that was interested in making a commitment and getting married, then go from there,” said Baker, an artist who lives in Roscoe Village, Ill. “So if they listed that they love to run marathons and spend vacations rock climbing, I knew that our lifestyles were different. But if they listed that they love a glass of red wine with a steak, I knew that the restaurant would also serve white wine and fish for me.”
Helen Fisher, a noted anthropologist at Rutgers University and author of numerous books, including “Why We Love” (Holt Paperbacks), says savvy matchmaking is crucial for 21st century relationships.
Seeking a companion
“We’re looking for a companion,” she said. “One hundred years ago a man needed a woman who would bear him healthy babies and take care of the home. Now we’re looking for a marriage between equals.”
That means carefully interpreting whatever data are in front of us.
“If you discover he’s reading a book about Bertrand Russell, that makes you think he’s educated, he’s curious, he’s therefore productive,” Fisher said. “The mind builds on these little pieces of information.”
Especially, she says, in a time when we’re less likely to pair ourselves with someone we’ve known since childhood.
“We don’t have our family and community to send signals,” she said. “You can’t sell your reputation, you can’t sell your upbringing. Suddenly the book you’re reading becomes magnificently important.”
Of course, the real work begins after a match is made.
“You still need the skills to make the relationship work,” said Parrott. “It’s not like you match up and you’re on easy street. You still need communication and conflict resolution and all the rest.”
Baker says her pre-Bob dating experience bears that out.
“It’s kind of like the housing market,” she said. “Because there’s so much on the market right now, people always want to see what else is out there. But I don’t like house-hunting. I find it very stressful. To me, I feel like I can live in a lot of different places. You make a place yours.
“It’s like that with dating,” she said. “A lot of people are looking for that perfect thing, you know? But it’s never going to be. You just have to have the same dreams and the same goals.”

Last weekend, Drew and I were in New York City (or more precisely, Weehawken, NJ, which is right across the river from Manhattan) at the “Worldwide Conference” of Matchmakers. This was the first one ever, or at least in recent memory, and what an interesting group of people to spend some time with! Graciously, or perhaps to improve the attendance, the matchmakers also included dating coaches, which is why I was there.
I’ve written about matchmakers here in my blog before. Frankly, I am such a do-it-yourselfer that I just can’t see paying someone else to do the work for me. It’s hard for me to take people seriously when they complain about how much Internet dating costs. It’s CHEAP, particularly when you start looking around at matchmakers. One guy at the conference was with a business that charges $60,000 to $120,000!!! Yup, that’s the right number of zeros you are seeing.
Matchmakers have seen a surge in business by riding on the coattails of Internet dating. While dating sites do take a chunk of business that matchmakers might have gotten before, Internet dating has paved the way for people to actually think about hiring someone to help them find love. And the theme I heard over and over was the potential market for matchmakers in frustrated online daters.
Still, the fantasy that many may have about matchmakers being able to find you a mate when you can’t find one yourself has many limitations. First, you still better be pretty marketable yourself: Attractive, in good health, not too old, and with something to offer. Particularly if you are female. ALL the matchmakers complained about the shortage of men, where do you find dates for these ladies?
And remember, matchmakers can only match you with people they have on their own roster. What if your perfect mate lives outside the matchmaker’s area, or would never sign up? Most matchmakers do not allow browsing through their roster either. You are subject to who they pick for you. Me? Uh uh.
Matchmakers also remind me of eHarmony, in that they do not take on people they don’t think they can match. Or the less ethical may take a client regardless of their match-ability, simply for the money. Yick. In fact, matchmakers used to routinely reject all women Over a Certain Age (like 40 or 45). For sure, the older you are if you are female, the greater your chances of being turned down by the matchmaker. Let alone a date.
So if you are male, have the bucks to spend, and no time to waste, you might do okay with matchmaking. However if you are female and over 40, you’d do much better getting online and doing the work yourself. That’s where the guys are.

Here we go again: Yet another article about how online dating is now mainstream and THE place to find love. Not that I am complaining about the positive coverage. Far from it. After all, it’s good for my business, right? And more importantly, good news for singles looking for love. This article also throws in a couple of cybercouples just for fun.
Finding your love at online dating site
We have become a society of high-tech people. The internet has changed the way we do business, how we learn and how we find love. Alicia Hansen, a 36-year-old mother of three, has been dating online, on and off, for a couple years. She does not care who knows. “People who don’t understand that it is part of our new world are like, ‘oh, you’re doing that?’” Today millions of people are “doing that,” trying to find their match online. In fact, online dating has become so main stream it’s even part of a class taught at the University of Minnesota.
“We don’t have the same connections that we used to have through church or family or neighborhood,” James Caron, U of M Social Science Professor said. There are plenty of sites on the internet that cater to those looking for love. Each one works a little differently. Most sites charge a fee, make you fill out a profile about yourself and then help you find people with whom you are most likely to be compatible. The rest is up to you. Dr. Elizabeth and Eileen parks met two years ago on MillionaireCupid.com.
“I did it for about four or five months before I winked at Ryan,” Elizabeth said. “I went on a lot of first dates, but I guess Ryan was my only second date.” Two weeks ago, they tied the knot. Certainly not every match ends up in marriage, but for a budding industry, the number of success stories might surprise you. It’s estimated that anywhere from 8 - 10 percent of all marriages are the result of people meeting online. There is a downside to dating online. It’s hard to tell someone’s tone in an email. Also, you have to trust that the people you meet are being truthful about themselves.
Not a problem, says Vince Turk. He met his wife Karen on eHarmony.com. “As somebody who is looking at profiles, you know the people who have invested time in it and put some money into it are pretty serious about wanting to meet somebody.” Karen couldn’t have been more honest. “I lived in a small town. I was approaching 40 and I had six kids,” Karen said. “There were just not a lot of options for me.” Vince lived in Minnesota. Karen lived in Iowa. But after a push from their combined eight children, the two decided to move from the cyber world to the real world. “We have two 15-year-olds, two 13-year-olds, a 12-year-old, 10-year-old, nine-year-old and a five-year-old.” This month, the Turks are celebrating their one-year anniversary.

Articles like the one below about how Internet dating is “in” have been popping up all over everywhere lately. While they are similar in tone and get repetitious, I find them so welcoming after what I have seen over the years. Five years ago when I was just getting started as a Romance Coach, searches yielded practically nothing, and what did show up tended to be scary. Not so with articles like this. Yea!
The Many Faces of Online Dating
By Erika Morphy
“Match.com is not for everybody,” says Todd Creager, a licensed clinical social worker and coauthor of Finding Life’s Passions. “There are those that thrive on generalized dating sites, but typically those are people who ‘show well’—whether it is due to looks, an extroverted style of writing, a natural sense of humor, social confidence or some combination of these qualities.”
Shoshanna Berman, an intern in New York City, is happily dating her ideal future husband: a nice, young—and tall—Orthodox Jewish man who is also outgoing and easygoing.
On date two, they bonded while scalping tickets at a Knicks game. Date ten, she remembers, was an all-night drive to Philadelphia.
“I would have married him if he asked me after the first date,” Berman tells TechNewsWorld, “but it took him a few months to realize the truth.” Now they are unofficially engaged.
Take away a few details here and there, and this could be anyone’s “how we met” story—including the fact that Berman met her beau at SawYouAtSinai.com, a dating Web site.
“My friend met her husband there, so I thought I would give it a try,” Berman says.
These days, anyone who scoffs at online dating is either married or in the priesthood. The U.S. online dating market—typified by such Web sites as Match.com and Yahoo Personals—will reach US$932 million in 2011, according to figures from JupiterResearch.
Soul Mate Search
More than 20 million Internet users visited such a site last December, reported comScore. The top destinations were Yahoo Personals, Match.com, True.com, Spark Networks and Singlesnet.com. In short, from 18-year-olds in college (where there should be no dearth of potential suitors) to senior citizens, multitudes are logging on in search of love or companionship.
To be sure, not everyone who goes online finds a happy ending. Horror stories abound from the horrifying—stalking incidents and worse have befallen many online daters—to the annoying. (Hint: Using photos more than a year or so old always backfires.)
Sometimes it just takes a little patience to find your soul mate, says Robert Schwartz, author of Courageous Souls: Do We Plan Our Life Challenges Before Birth? Schwartz met his partner at JDate, another popular Jewish dating site. Several years ago, he posted a profile there but nothing came of it. Recently, though, in the most serendipitous manner possible, he connected with a woman, and they’re about to move in together.
“I had been living in Oregon but thinking about moving home to Cleveland to look after my father, who was needing assistance,” he tells TechNewsWorld. Idly, he perused the profiles in Cleveland and immediately gravitated toward the woman who would become his partner. “What I loved about her profile is that I could tell immediately she is spiritually aware. That is very important to me.”
Fast-forward over several months of phone calls and visits. Schwartz is now moving to Cleveland.
Specialized Sites
It may be no accident that both Schwartz and Berman met partners on specialized dating sites. Mainstream dating site memberships are stagnating—or, in some cases, shrinking. The proportion of paying customers has stayed the same—5 percent—over the last five years, according to Jupiter.
Another Jupiter metric that suggests interest is beginning to decline: Only 10 percent of Internet users visited an online dating site in 2006—a decrease from 16 percent in 2005 and 21 percent in 2002.
One way the online dating industry is counteracting these trends is by introducing specialized Web sites that focus on commonalities that would-be daters hope to find. Many focus on religion; some focus on hobbies or professions.
Sparks Network, currently one of the top online destinations, operates over 30 online personals—all but one of which is targeted toward a specific religious, ethnic or special interest group. JDate, launched in 1997, was its first site.
It makes sense, some say.
“Match.com is not for everybody,” Todd Creager, a licensed clinical social worker and coauthor of Finding Life’s Passions, tells TechNewsWorld. “There are those that thrive on generalized dating sites, but typically those are people who ‘show well’—whether it is due to looks, an extroverted style of writing, a natural sense of humor, social confidence, or some combination of these qualities.”
Singles who do not make great first impressions end up feeling frustrated, he continues. “On a specialized dating site, one attraction may be the similarity of interests, vocation, religion, life challenges and so on.”
Next Evolutionary Step
Specialized sites are the way to go for today’s daters, says Steve Monas, author of several books about online dating and social networking, including Chemistry and Numbers: The Online Dating Guide.
“When I used JDate, there was already a feeling of comfortability, knowing that there will be some commonality moving forward,” he tells TechNewsWorld.
However, the specialized sites may follow the path of the generic dating Web sites, he cautioned—unless they evolve once again.
“Dating Web sites are now trying to get appealing features that will compete with free social networking sites such as MySpace.com and Plentyoffish.com,” Monas notes. These sites, after all, are de facto meeting places and have come to compete with some of the larger, specialized dating sites.
Revenue from major sites will have to come from more personalized services—such as selecting and contacting potential matches on behalf of members, he suggests.
Indeed, some of the newer specialized sites are focusing on what happens once you get past the third or so date and become a couple. eHarmony, a dating Web site known for its hour-long application—and, more controversially, for not matching gay people—has launched a Web site aimed at married couples who want to strengthen their relationship.
On the other end of the spectrum—the far end—is HoochyMail, a service that “brings couples closer together by safely and securely allowing them to create and share their mutual fantasies,” according to site spokesperson Rob Frankle.
Basically, HoochyMail allows each couple to compose and e-mail Email Marketing Software - Free Demo fantasies customized with their own details. There are about 35 different occasions—from Christmas to Thanksgiving to basketball playoffs—in the system Manage remotely with one interface—the HP ProLiant DL360 G5 server..
Thus far, the site has been very successful, judging by almost every metric, Frankle says, including opt-in numbers and click-through advertising rates. “Plus, we have never received even one hate mail.”
In the online dating world, that’s as good as it gets.

You know, it wasn’t that long ago that I couldn’t find anything at all online or otherwise about Internet dating. I love it when mainstream magazines come out with great articles like the one below. The author here is a firm supporter of online dating and knows why—she does it herself. But she also treats the issue off lying and deception, and interestingly, the willingness of the receiver of the deception to believe it. Have a read and let me know what you think.
Best, Kathryn Lord
Your Romance Coach
Online Dating Not Just a Trend
Your computer as effective matchmaker. But beware, the internet leaves plenty of room for deception.
By:Hara Estroff Marano
Surely you heard about the Kassem Saleh, the “Army Romeo” who while married and making Afghanistan safe for democracy found time to propose to 50 or so women electronically, all of whom he had “met” via email.
The internet leaves plenty of room for deception on both ends. On the sending end, anybody can describe himself falsely, although I’m not sure why he would—if a flesh-and-blood meeting is the ultimate goal. Sooner or later there has to be a reckoning. This aspect of the internet has received a lot of attention, maybe more than it deserves.
More intriguing is the deception that occurs at the receiving end of e-mail. It’s there that the power of emotions and belief and need can commingle to deceive one into believing that a real and durable relationship exists purely in unverified words.
Part of the problem is that you read e-mail in private. It’s just you alone with your own psyche, its dreams and its hungers. Many of the usual brakes on human behavior are absent. There are no friends around to reality-test against. Your mind is free to run away with itself.
And there is in fact something about the my turn/your turn rhythm of exchange of e-mail, and the slow revelation of self it allows, that is exciting. I think of it as slow dancing at the cyber café. It’s truly seductive.
All the more reason why critical faculties should go online as well as hopes and dreams. Hopes and dreams are not enough to build a relationship on anytime, anywhere, on or off the internet. Colonel Saleh isn’t the first to dupe women; it started long before the internet was ever conceived.
I am concerned less with Saleh than I am with the women he toyed with, although there has to be some psychic flaw that would encourage someone to a) spend that much time online and b) get his kicks by deceiving, and thus harming, others. It’s called sociopathy in the psych biz. I’m not sure that it’s punishable by court martial, as his contacts are now demanding.
The sad part may be that the wooed women were drawn from tallpersonals.com, targeted because they were guaranteed to be needy, placed by the accident of height in a Darwinian social universe that made them less sought after as potential mates. And of course, that would have given them a whole lot less practice at love and a lot less knowledge about it.
I consider myself a romantic, but romance for me isn’t glass slippers and overwrought declarations, as it seemed to be for Saleh’s conquests. “He made us feel like goddesses, fairy princesses, Cinderellas. We had all found our Superman, our knight in shining armor,” said one disappointed bride-to-be.
Maybe it’s because I have had long-term experience with the real thing, enough to know that love isn’t about finding Superman. Superman doesn’t exist. We love in spite of someone’s flaws. It’s much sexier and allows moments of unalloyed transcendance.
I would throw up if any guy said to me, whether to my face or in an e-mail, as Saleh reportedly did to his correspondents, “You and the thought of you have created a desire so deep within my soul that I cannot fathom a time I will ever be without you.” I would be embarrassed to tell another human being that I might actually have fallen for such a line. I would wonder about the sanity of any guy who proposed to me online without ever having met me.
Most of all, I don’t want someone who can’t live without me; I want someone who can live without me but chooses not to. Someone with a stronger sense of self than Saleh’s messages suggest. That’s what real love demands.
If Saleh’s declarations didn’t seem overblown on their own merits, there was a dead giveaway to deception. He told at least one woman that as a result of parachute jumping he had actually shrunk from over six feet to about five foot nine. I’m sorry, that’s just a howler. Still no suspicion?
I suppose that I am truly annoyed at Kassem Saleh—but mostly for giving internet dating a bad name. Online daters are not all losers longing for Superman. I demand a personal apology.
I not only think posting an online personals ad is a great idea, I’m actually doing it. I’m a 60-year-old widow who is busy working, volunteering, living a life. I had a great long-term relationship; I know how good love can be. I want to go through life with a partner.
By the time one reaches adulthood, one is hopefully spinning down some reasonably interesting, possibily individualistic, path in life. You have some special facets you’d like to more or less align with someone else’s interests. So the pool of possibilities shrinks considerably. I just don’t encounter that many eligible males now in the course of a day. The intelligent use of the internet opens up possibilities of people who might live a block away but whom I might not ordinarily encounter.
Before I leapt online, I researched personals sites, read ads posted by males and those posted by females. Most were boring (is there a guy who doesn’t want to cuddle by the fire, walk barefoot on the beach or believe in “chemistry,” whatever that is?)
I wanted my profile to work hard for me, to entice the kind of guy I might actually like—while screening out unsuitables. A good profile, I decided, provides an accurate picture of a person, in words.
I have met a few extraordinary guys. There are definitely some world-class guys out there. So successful was the first profile I posted online that I urged a newly divorced friend to follow suit. I drafted her profile, an appealing—and accurate—verbal snapshot of her. Four months ago I was matron of honor at her wedding.
I am now back in the market, and I’ve posted a new personals ad. I like to think it captures my essence, conveys my wit and spunk—demonstrates it rather than my having to declare it—and so keeps away the humorless and the insecure.
ROAD-TESTED. HANDLES WELL!! I’ve been around the block but I’m in excellent condition. Maybe even better than new. Powerful, smart and very lively engine. Fully automatic, .... You get the picture.
Warped Romeos need not reply.

Ya’ll know I have my problems with True.com (see my postings here), but I am not above quoting their surveys (minus their self-promoting ya-ya). This is from a True.com press release:
Survey results showed that most single fathers agree that online dating is a safer and easier method for meeting other singles:
—75 percent of respondents said that online dating is the easiest way
for single parents to meet others
—67 percent said that online dating is a safer way to date
And:
The survey also revealed that saving time is considered the most popular convenience of online dating:
—37 percent said that online dating helped them balance time between
work, dating and family
—More than half (53 percent) go out on traditional dates less than once
a month

Thinking about love is a lot different than experiencing the real thing. When you are thinking, you can fantasize, make all the details perfect.
It’s sort of like a rape fantasy: No sane woman or man wants to be raped. But many enjoy the fantasy of not having to take responsibility for sexuality. A fantasy rape allows you to do that, while having complete control of the messy details like who the rapist is and whether you will really get hurt.
Many people spend a good deal of time thinking and fantasizing about finding a Sweetheart and falling in love. Those fantasies are always better than reality. A real man or woman has a very hard time measuring up to a juicy creative fantasy.
Add the Internet, with its limited information (the printed word and maybe a very nice attractive photo or two), add a reasonably good writer, and you’ve got the recipe for real life disappointment.
“Getting to know you” has a tendency to disappoint. We fill in the gaps of what we don’t know, and usually we fill those gaps with what we want. Reality does not measure up.
And then, the not-so-nice realities mount up and the disappointment takes over.
Internet daters, like all romantics, need to recognize the power of fantasy and imagination. Both are great, but not real. People, wives and husbands are real people, not any more perfect than you are. And the fantasy—and resulting disappointment—that you have painted is yours.
Get grounded. Get real. Look around you at the real people who are roughly your age and see what they look like. See what you look like, too.
Assess what you are bringing to the table, and do not be unrealistic about what you can expect in exchange. Be charitable, and at least kind and polite to those who don’t meet your inflated expectation.
From Your Romance Coach, Kathryn Lord

Ever since I started working to help singles find love using the Internet, I have been astounded at the numbers of people who get impatient at the process and try to hurry it along or quit altogether. “Three emails and then meet for coffee or I am done.” “I met three different guys and they all lied about their age, so I pulled my profile.”
Folks who rush the process are depriving themselves of one of the chief advantages of meeting online: The ability (if you use it) to prescreen potential dates.
Because you get information via a person’s online dating profile that you would seldom get before a traditional date with a relative stranger, and because you are meeting online rather than in real time and space, you can study what the other presents, ask questions, look for gaps or inconsistencies, and read the lines as well as between them. You can learn a lot by what and how a person writes, as well as what they don’t. And all without dealing with the nerves and worries of a first date.
You are bound to waste a lot of time (and drink a lot of coffee) if you move too fast from first contact to first “real time and space” meeting. You could also be inviting trouble. Move gradually, starting with emails through the website, then through a safe email address (Have you set up a Yahoo! or Hotmail email account that is not traceable to you? You can email me for instructions on how to do so). Then, phone contact: Use a cell phone, block your phone number using *67, or set up an anonymous phone number (see my blog piece on how to do so)
We all have the responsibility to prove that we are normal, real and truthful people to potential dates—and they have that responsibility to us, too. Regular, predictable contact over time will allow you both to build trust—or not.
From Your Romance Caoch, Kathryn Lord

A study by a German Internet dating site (www.single.de) found that older singles did better with online dating than younger folks. The figures quoted in a posting on IOL Technology are a bit confusing, but interesting. The site (which has more than 2.4 million visitors monthly) found that 15% of people age 40 to 50 said they had found a lasting partner on the Internet, while the figure was 11% for those 31 to 40 and only 10% for those 21 to 30.
Buried in an article in Forbes were these figures from Jupiter Research: Online dating is a $494 million industry, expected to reach $642 by 2008. The big three dating sites (Match.com, Yahoo! Personals and eHarmony) account from between 2/3’s and 3/4’s of the total online dating traffic.
Also quoted in the Forbes article was the results of a February 2005 survey by WeddingChannel.com that 12% of engaged or recently married couples met online.
From Your Romance Coach, Kathryn Lord

Here’s a great Q & A on About.com about online dating and seniors, so good that I posted a comment. Here are my words below:
This link to “Is Online Dating Right for You?” gives a great positive overview of the wonderful resource that Internet dating has provided for singles of all ages, but for seniors in particular. Where are all the nice older men (and women)? Online and looking!
I am a Romance Coach working mostly with singles over 50. Internet dating is THE best resource, and best of all, online, it is okay for women to make the first move. Men LIKE it.
I would also add that singles should be prepared to devote plenty of time to their search. We often wish that finding romance should be easy and “just happen,” but we should expect that the older and more certain of ourselves that we become, the fewer the “right” partners there will be.
Please visit my website at http://www.Find-a-Sweetheart.com and feel free to brouse the copious information there. And subscribe to my free email newsletter *eMAIL to eMATE*
Best, Kathryn Lord
Your Romance Coach

James Silver writes about his return to dating at age 35 (a youngster!) in a lengthy article “Dating game? It’s more like a war zone” for the London Daily Mail. Mostly, the article is a description of first date disasters which began online and off, but I thought one of his observations was particularly apt:
Until a couple of years ago, online romance was a freak show peopled by drooling creeps, social misfits with teddy-bear collections still living with their mothers at 43 and those let out on day-release.
Anyway, in just five years that has changed entirely. While no doubt you would still be able to root out a host of oddballs on every dating site, now many attractive, functional single men and women, who hold down good jobs and don’t live with their mums, are at it, too. And, most significantly, they talk about it openly, compare notes and laugh about their (many) dating disasters.
Since I met my husband on Match.com in 1998, I can’t agree with Silver that up 2004, online daters were members of a freak show, but I do agree that in the last five years, Internet dating has arrived. The turning point was 9/11/2001. Remember what we all went through? Suddenly, we had an almost universal awareness of the brevity of life and an aching for family and connection. People FLOCKED to online dating sites looking for partners. Suddenly, looking for love online was mainstream, and the cyber-closet was no longer needed.
Yes, dating sites have their share of weirdos and misfits, just like in the general population. Yes, you have to weed through to find the gems. But now you know where they are hanging out. And focus on the jewels, not the garbage around them.
From Your Romance Coach, Kathryn Lord

|
 |