DavidLA68"s UnPerfectMatch
I got this very amusing link yesterday from a reader, evidently in response to my review of “Must Love Dogs” and PerfectMatch.com’s rather blatant product placement in that film. The reader is Dave, the author of the linked article. It chronicles amusingly his experience last February with being matched on “Dr. Phil” by the PerfectMatch folks. Or at least he thought he was going to be matched, because it seems from the article that he never was. Dr. Phil and the show come across pretty well (see Dave’s “Editor Note” that prefaces the article), but PerfectMatch gets raked over the coals.
I saw the “Dr. Phil” show that Dave was on, and indeed, the guys looked pretty much like deer in the head lights. The show as a whole was not one of Dr. Phil’s best, to say the least. But I did again recognize the coup of PerfectMatch and product placement. See my review of “Must Love Dogs.” Somebody at PerfectMatch is doing a pretty terrific job with product placement. Follow through does not seem to be the strong point of PerfectMatch, however, at least according to Dave. Far from Perfect.
Dave is no longer on PerfectMatch, but he’s still looking for Los Angeles women on Match.com. You can find him there under DavidLA68 . I just checked. He’s cute!
Dave’s article also reinforces what I have said before: PerfectMatch and eHarmony are not the best sites for women. The odds are very poor—at least PerfectMatch is honest about it, advertising to men that the female to male ratio is 2:1. And likely, the older the women get, the more out of whack the odds. I think it is similar at eHarmony, though it’s hard to find that stated anywhere.
From Your Romance Coach, Kathryn Lord

I continue to be dumbfounded by all this discussion on internet dating. I completely agree ... it is like playing Battleship and trying to find the one ship that will sink. Yet I see so many success stories. Is this just marketing hype?
Perhaps it’s time to coin a new term: “Internet Dating Threshold” (IDT), defined as the point at which a woman on an internet dating site is actually serious enough about wanting to meet someone that she will actually consider answering an initial email, entering conversation, and showing up on a simple/casual date that she can easily leave after an hour.
I find the IDT of most women to be unreasonably high ... and it gets worse (instead of better) as they get older. The battleship gets harder and harder to sink.
As someone else said on another post, “I also get the impression that online dating, as opposed to other types of dating, helps to make people overly unreasonable in their requirements. Because the technology allows people to screen easily and in detail, people go overboard. “If I can choose any type of person to date, why don’t I just screen out anyone who doesn’t fit the ‘perfect date’ profile?”
So how is it that there seem to be so many success stories?
L.
Posted by Anonymous on 08/02 at 10:46 AM