Kathryn's Blog

Kathryn, this is the owner of 4M Club speaking…please note there is an error in your blog concerning our women clientele…we don’t have 25,000 women on file…but 250 to 300, yes!

While it is a national service, by design it’s considered a small, boutique club…that’s why we’ve had a few marriages and engagements so far…our members receive highly personalized service!

Please make necessary correction, if possible.  Thank you very much.

Posted by CHRIS STELMACK  on  10/07  at  04:41 PM

Chris, if you read my posting closely, you’ll see that I was talking about the Millionaires’ Club with that 25,000.  Not your organization.

Posted by Kathryn Lord  on  10/10  at  01:10 PM

i have heard 4m club is a scam.  men and women both have claimed it to be so.

Posted by Anonymous  on  02/14  at  12:40 PM

My name is Anita and 4M Club is a waste of time. Ladies, don’t waste your time!

Posted by Anonymous  on  03/06  at  04:01 PM

Listen up: 4M CLUB IS A WASTE OF MONEY TIME AND ENERGY.  SAVE YOUR MONEY AND SEND IT TO STARVING CHILDREN RATHER THAN SUPPORT A CROOK.

Posted by daisy  on  05/22  at  12:47 PM

Hi am Tom an in need for a friend from Australia or the USA
females only ages 27-30
Any race is welcome
thanks
Tom

Posted by Tomson Ak  on  04/03  at  04:32 AM

I think that a lot of women may be disappointed by a services such as these because these services are based on the need of the man.  And of course these men pay for that type of attention.  They choose who they want to meet and the women sit and wait for someone who is interested in them.
So it may not be 4M Club’s fault that women think it is a scam.  Its not a scam but a service for men.

Posted by Little Miss  on  07/11  at  02:08 PM

Actually http://www.searchingmillionaire.com is much better than 4M Club. I joined and found many quality members.The price is also reasonable.

Posted by bobby  on  08/24  at  04:54 AM

Can you tell me why 4M is a crook in your mind?  I’ll listen to your side of the story.  I just want to know why you deem it such.  Examples?  Thank you.

Posted by 4m inquiry  on  04/04  at  12:26 PM

4m, read my posting carefully at the top and you will see that I never say that 4M is a crook.  What I do say is that I am very uncomfortable with rich men paying lots of money to meet (very attractive) women who sign up (and in 4M’s case, pay $250) to meet rich men.  I’m assuming that 4M is on the right side of the law, so go for it, if that’s the way you want to earn your money or spend it.  But it certainly doesn’t seem a big step away from the kind of meetings that Eliot Spitzer lost his job over.

Posted by Kathryn Lord  on  04/04  at  12:53 PM

Sorry Kathryn, I was not implying that YOU said that Chris at 4m was a crook.  Not at all.  I was wondering why a POSTER here may have implied that.  I am willing to at least hear why a POSTER here would consider her a crook.

Posted by 4m  on  04/08  at  12:17 PM

It is “Daisy” who used the word “crook” above.  I HAVE heard “crook” used in reference to OTHER upscale matchmakers.  For example, a disgruntled poster once called the owners of modelqualityintroductions.com as “those crooks.”  If Daisy (or anybody with feelings like hers) is willing to give an example to the best of their comfort as to why they feel that way, I’m always receptive to hearing their side of the story.
I like your Eliot Spitzer reference, even though it’s not a funny situation, and I know that you don’t mean it facetiously. 
Kathryn, if you’re comfortable saying, do you think that this may be that closely related to the Spitzer case?  Because a long term relationship potential is what I am looking for, and sexual relations are NOT what I’m in this for.  Thanks again.

Posted by 4m inquiry  on  04/08  at  12:22 PM

Most of the postings here (except for this one and the last four) are a year older or more.  It’s unlikely that Daisy who posted on 05/22 at 05:47 PM is still reading these comments.  Kathryn

Posted by Kathryn Lord  on  04/08  at  12:35 PM

So that means that, even if I’m willing to spend some money, this is, or is NOT something to join, if I want a consensual booty call?  I’m not interested in marrying now, and just want to meet women for a consensual booty call.

Posted by D. Minnard  on  04/08  at  06:49 PM

Deer Kathryn.  I am at a point in my life where I am seriously considering taking a bold risk into 4M Club, b/c while the risk is high, the reward may be too good to miss, if it works that way.  I know that I am the type easiest to take advantage of, b/c of my emotions.  I want you to be as tough on me, with as much gustified tough love, before I go ahead and hand over such mucho dough.  If you want to tell me to go for it, but also want to tell me that I’m probably just going to get a bunch of attractive dates (and possibly sex), but probably no relationship beyond dinners and sex, then I want you to beat me down with words.  Please, be as harsh and firm with me as you need to be, because it’s better that I take harsh criticism from you, than spend mucho dough and be sorry.

Posted by Be tough with me please  on  04/08  at  07:07 PM

Now, those last two comments challenge this Romance Coach.  First to D. Minnard, I don’t at all get the sense that 4M or the like are set up for “consensual booty calls.” Maybe you haven’t heard, but there is a dating site seemingly made for you: http://onlinebootycall.com/  Problem is with sites like onlinebootycall and AshleyMadison.com (for married folks who want affairs) is that they appeal much more to men than women, so you have hugely disproportionate gender ratios, i. e. lots more men than women.  D. Minnard, sounds to me like you willing to pay for sex, and we all know what that means, right?

Now to answer “Be tough with me please,” (though goodness this sounds like S&M;), I have no idea if what you would get through 4M or other such sites would be what you worry about “I’m probably just going to get a bunch of attractive dates (and possibly sex), but probably no relationship beyond dinners and sex” or something more permanent.  I guess that’s the risk you take with any date, whether you pay big bucks to get it or not.  I wonder what’s going on with you that you are not able to get good dates that could eventually lead to a long term relationship without paying lots of money?  Sounds like you could use a Romance Coach to help you figure out what could help.  Let me know if you’d like to talk.  I’d be much more able to give you good advice if I knew more.

Kathryn

Posted by Kathryn Lord  on  04/09  at  05:36 AM

Deer Kathryn.  The reason why I probably don’t get dates on my own much, is b/c I’m not in many good right situations to meet women.  No dating co-workers.  I’m not looking for the “booty call” as D. Minnard said above, so I’m certainly not looking in bars.  I think fear of rejection is why I don’t take more chances.  But if 4M or a like matchmaker can do the leg work for me, and I think it’s fair that I pay an honest expert to match me, that’s why I’m at least receptive.

Posted by Be tough with me Please  on  04/10  at  05:35 PM

I would have to agree that model quality introductions is a scam, the owner is running an escort agency rather then a matchmaking firm. I used their service, paid the $25000 membership cost and got to meet only two women both of whom were not model quality, I am very found if a site called viviansguide.com, they offer a boutique
matchmaking agency and allow you to search thier entire database of pre-screened women for a low monthly fee, they have a selection of over 2000 women to choose from. I would advise anyone going to any of these high priced matchmakers, do your homework first so you don’t get scammed!

Posted by Jake  on  03/22  at  11:03 AM